Thursday, October 31, 2019

First draft of my final thoughts to my book "Trade War with China"


My final thoughts


Misconception

Even today (almost 2020), I still heard of many naïve arguments on China such as poor quality, stealing our IPs and no innovation. It was true ten years ago in 2010 but not any more in 2020.

First, do you find poor quality in Apple’s products and most of them are assembled in China? Quality control is the responsibility of the companies who outsource their manufacturing to China. China needs to establish brand names to boost consumers’ confidence.

Take 5G as an example. Huawei has nothing to steal from us as they have more advanced products such as their new phones and we do not sell even 4G networks.

If they can send a space ship to moon, these projects have to be supported by industries with advanced capability and decent quality control. They have many innovations in building infrastructure. The new Beijing airport has been built in less than 5 years; we would spend 5 years in arguing how to build such big projects. We cannot build such huge projects as they may be credited by the next political party which may not be themselves.

Our government is trying to stop China from passing us (will discuss each item). It will stop China in a few years, but it will backfire and make China even more dominant in five or so years. The trade war is not about trade any more.

·        5G.
Ericsson and Nokia are years behind Huawei. Some countries such as Germany and United Kingdom have to choose side. Verizon may have to pay Huawei royalties in using their 5G patents.

Most countries cannot find any security backdoor as claimed by our government.

The U.S. consequences- There is a good chance that some African countries will use 5G network far earlier than us.

·        Trade and GDP
Both U.S. and China will suffer from the trade war. The U.S.’s GDP will fall below 2% and China’s will fall below 6% for the first time in the last 30 or so years. It would affect most economies.

·        Chips (or core technology).
China has been investing heavily today in core technology such as chips. It will take time to catch up. Huawei can produce a phone without any software and hardware from the U.S.  It is harder to sell their phones outside China without Google’s apps, but some can easily load these apps illegally to Huawei’s phones. China can have the memory chips from other sources and/or using some outdated chips made in China.

The U.S. consequences- Most chip companies will lose financially. Recently I sold my MU and QCOM.

·        Decoupling.
It is in many fronts such as foreign students from China and research cooperation. Chinese students will be diverted to many other countries such as United Kingdom and there will be more universities in China, some of which are formed by foreign institutions.

The U.S. Consequences- Our colleges will lose financially as most Chinese students pay full tuitions while most foreign students from Africa are not paying full tuitions. The research institutions will suffer due to lack of qualified students / researchers. We also lose a lot of money from tourism as Chinese spend most per tourist (due to high import taxes from China) and the large size of tourists from China.

·        Space station.
By 2025, China could be the only country that has a space station after ours retires. China welcomes all countries to participate in their space station program while the U.S. bans China from participating in ours.

·        Delisting Chinese companies.
In 2018, the top 4 IPOs out of the top 10 in the U.S. were Chinese companies. It will hurt Chinese in funding new companies. London, Hong Kong and eventually Shenzhen and Macau will benefit. 
The U.S. Consequences- The investment bankers managing IPOs will suffer. It will be a mess delisting so many Chinese companies. I do not know what China will retaliate the U.S. companies doing business in China. Apple’s sales has been suffering in China. U.S. is looking for a solution on the tariff on Apple’s products imported from China to fend off Samsung’s advantage whose majority of their products are assembled in South East Asia.

·        Chinese fight back.
It may withdraw their debts; China is #1 or #2 foreign country in buying our debts. With our high debts, the reserve status of USD will be harmed. China has already used their currency in their oil exchange. I predict in 2025, USD would be down to 50% from the current 65% of global country reserves. EU’s Euro would gain from 20% to 25% and China’s Yuan would gain from 1% to 5%.

China may ban export of rare earth elements to U.S. Since many weapons depend on these elements, China has a real argument on national security.

·        World peace.
With China’s advances in military technology, the world is more peaceful than today on the contrary. It is the balance of power as evidenced by the cold war between U.S. and the Russia.

With the low oil prices, the disputed islands in South China Sea will not be a concern now. The only concern is the invasion of Taiwan. Taiwanese at one time wanted to invade China to recover the lost land, so it would be a civil war then and now, and most likely China would win.

·        S.E. Asia, Africa, S. America and Russia.
Most countries especially Russia win big by supplying farm products and energy to China.

China helps S.E. Asia and Africa to build the infrastructure as part of their “One Belt, One Road” Initiative. Many Chinese factories have been moved to S.E. Asia due to the trade war between the two largest economies.

China has built many infrastructure, hospitals and stadiums in Africa. Hence, China is looking for long-term relationship.

·        Europe.
EU will spit in their decisions to support China or not. So far, Germany, Spain, Italy and many smaller countries side with China. United Kingdom most likely will implement 5G from China.

·        Mexico, Canada, Australia, India and Japan.
They will side with U.S. due to the financial ties. Australia is a surprise to me as they have been benefiting from the China trade. It is more political and financial insecure by not siding with China.

With the prolonged conflict, most global economies would be in a recession and so would be the stock markets.

Links

The following are more recent additions and most are on China.

Mega projects.

Food: Mega project, farming

Manufacturing: Mega project

Engineering: Innovation, 2, HSR

Energy: Mega project

Transportation & infrastructure: Mega project, infrastructure  

One Belt One Road:  1

Technology: Mega project, Challenging, 5G

Education: Better than US?

Military: Drone, Carrier killer  


# Filler 12 noon is not 12 pm

The Chinese restaurant I went to says they are open at 12 am. Are they wrong or is the world wrong?

The next hour after 11 am is 12 am, NOT 12 pm. The one who set it up did it totally wrong and no one complains about it until now. If I were born earlier, I would have corrected it. If I were born here, I would be the president and every one would have a job by now.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Click here for my new book "Trade War with China".

Saturday, October 26, 2019

Adaptive Strategy


What is the best metric for evaluating stocks? Most people will tell you P/E. I use estimated earnings (E) and P/E becomes Forward P/E (a.k.a. Expected P/E). Switch it over to E/P for easier to understand, and it is termed Earnings Yield (EY = P/E). However, the ‘E’ is not ‘expected’ which is better to predict future stock value. I prefer EY to be calculated with Forward Earnings and most sites do not provide it but you can calculate it easily.

When the market favors momentum stocks, fundamental stocks even with good Earnings Yields may not work. In this case, I prefer momentum stocks with EY better than average.

EV/EBITDA (obtainable from Yahoo!Finance) is better than P/E as it includes interest, debt and cash. Switch it over and it is True Earnings Yield (my term).

Some may tell you ROI and there is a successful book on ROI.

Both P/E and ROI should not be the only metric as there is no single evergreen metric. That is why most people have poor performance by following them blindly. It is the herd theory: The performance is usually decreased in the longer term when too many folks follow it.

Here is my test on the S&P 500 stocks from April 1, 2019 to July 1, 2019.
I used the top 10 stocks from each sort. Commissions, dividends and spreads are omitted for simplicity. SPY’s return is annualized to 13.8%.

Value parameters
Top 10 stocks sorted by
Best SPY1
EY in descending order
-251%
Dividend Yield in descending order
-291%2

Opposite of the above
Top 10 stocks sorted by
Best SPY1
EY in ascending order
6%
Dividend Yield = 0
138%3

1   Beat by % = (Avg. return of 10 stocks – SPY) / SPY
2   Including dividend yields for the average 10 stocks and SPY, “Beat SPY’ is reduced to -241%.
3   Just randomly picked the 10 stocks that do not pay dividends as there are more stocks with no dividends.



-------------------

For more of my reasoning, check out the book described next. The Kindle has 850 pages (6*9) for $9.99. It could be the best $10 you ever spend.

The above is an abstract from my book "Complete the Art of Investing" which is available from Amazon.



I challenged to have the best-performed article in Seeking Alpha history, an investing site, for recommending 5 or more stocks in one year after the publish date. The concepts for that article are discussed in this book.

--------------------