To many, FAANG
stocks define the market. To me, a conservative investor, it is not. For
market-cap ETFs such as SPY, FAANG has more weights than other stocks. As a
group, FAANG has been very profitable for the last year. To me they seem to be
risky today. The following tables summarize them and I’ll check them one year
later and/or after September (usually the worst month) to confirm my findings.
It is also a case of momentum vs. value.
All the info are available free
in web sites such as finviz.com. All data are based on 8/5/2017. They are for
info only and I’m not liable for any errors. Returns are annualized and
dividends are not included.
Stocks
|
Current
Price
8/5/17
|
From 8/5/16
to
8/7/17
|
From 8/7/17
to 8/7/18
|
From 8/7/18
to 10/7/18
|
FB
|
169.62
|
37%
|
7%
|
-84%
|
AMZN
|
173.85
|
29%
|
88%
|
2%
|
AAPL
|
156.39
|
48%
|
30%
|
48%
|
NFLX
|
180.27
|
48%
|
94%
|
-4%
|
GOOGL
|
945.79
|
17%
|
33%
|
-47%
|
Avg.1
|
247.41
|
44%
|
50%
|
-17%
|
Beat SPY by
|
214%2
|
233%
|
-440%
|
|
SPY
|
14%
|
15%
|
5%
|
1 All averages in this
article are estimates.
2 Beat = (44% - 14%)
/14=214%. Similar to other calculations for “Beat”.
Fundamentals as of 8/5/2017
Stocks
|
P/E
|
P/E
FWD
|
P/S
|
P/B
|
Debt/
Eq.
|
Sales
Q/Q
|
EPS
Q/Q
|
ROE
|
FB
|
37
|
26
|
15
|
7
|
0.00
|
45
|
69
|
23
|
AMZN
|
16
|
14
|
6
|
4
|
1.11
|
2
|
18
|
27
|
AAPL
|
18
|
15
|
4
|
6
|
0.73
|
5
|
10
|
35
|
NFLX
|
221
|
90
|
8
|
25
|
1.55
|
32
|
58
|
13
|
GOOGL
|
34
|
24
|
7
|
4
|
0.03
|
21
|
-28
|
14
|
Avg.
|
65
|
34
|
8
|
9
|
0.68
|
21
|
25
|
22
|
Beat SPY 1
|
164%
|
277%
|
186%
|
|||||
SPY2
|
25
|
2
|
3
|
1
Very rough estimates.
2
Most fundamental metrics are from
other source than finviz.com, so there may be small discrepancy.
Technical as of 8/5/2017
Stocks
|
SMA50%
|
SMA200%
|
RSI(14)
|
52-week height
|
Short%
|
Insider
Trans.
|
FB
|
8%
|
23%
|
67
|
-3%
|
1%
|
-86%
|
AMZN1
|
35%
|
8%
|
51
|
-6%
|
1%
|
0%
|
AAPL
|
5%
|
17%
|
63
|
-2%
|
1%
|
-31%
|
NFLX
|
10%
|
26%
|
59
|
-6%
|
6%
|
-69%
|
GOOGL2
|
-2%
|
8%
|
41
|
-6%
|
0%
|
0%
|
Avg.
|
11%
|
16%
|
56
|
-5%
|
2%
|
-37%
|
Beat 3 SPY by
|
1020%
|
173%
|
-9%
|
1
Recent double top. Bearish.
2
Multiple top.
3
Very rough estimates.
The
two SMA (Simple Moving Average) technical metrics are positive.
Summary
As
a group, FAANG is fundamentally unsound but technically sound compared to SPY.
I said the same on the market. As
suggested, use trailing stops if you own any of these stocks. When they turn to
be technically unsound, this is the time to exit. They could stay in the
current valuations for a long time. However, when the institution investors are
dumping them, they will fall very fast and steep. SMA-20% would be a good
indicator for exit. NFLX is the most fundamentally unsound.
Update
8/7/2018. The rosy pictures of these stocks have been priced in. I recommend to
sell the stocks with P/E over 35 unless you have good reasons not to. It is
insurance to protect your profits. Even if they still rocket higher, you still
have a good sleep. When any bad news occurs, it would rocket back to earth.
Newton’s Law of Gravity?
Update 12/3/2018. From 8/7/18 to 12/3/18 (yesterday), FAANG lost 75% annualized while SPY lost 35% annualized without including dividends.
--------------------
-------------------
For more of my reasoning, check out the book described next. It has 950 pages (6*9) for $9.99. It could be the best $10 you ever spend.
The above is an abstract from my book "Complete the Art of Investing" which is available from Amazon.
I challenged to have the best-performed article in Seeking Alpha history, an investing site, for recommending 5 or more stocks in one year after the publish date. The concepts for that article are discussed in this book.
For more of my reasoning, check out the book described next. It has 950 pages (6*9) for $9.99. It could be the best $10 you ever spend.
The above is an abstract from my book "Complete the Art of Investing" which is available from Amazon.
I challenged to have the best-performed article in Seeking Alpha history, an investing site, for recommending 5 or more stocks in one year after the publish date. The concepts for that article are discussed in this book.
--------------------