As of 6/2019, I predict the trade
war would be ended soon while President Trump may want to postpone it to the
election. However, after two months, I
suspect the trade war cannot be avoided as China published their paper of no
compromise. Trump-made problem would be fixed and Trump would declare victory.
Trump cares about his election in less than 2 years and Xi’s 10-year term has
plenty of years left. A full-fledged trade war could not be good for both
countries and the rest of the global economies.
I expect the forced transfer of
technologies will be eliminated. It is an unfair bait for gaining the Chinese
market. We have to blame the U.S. CEOs signing these agreements for their bonus
consideration. So far, both sides have lost a combined total of 6 billion. Many
long-term harms have been done to the U.S. Here is a summary of the actions and
counter-actions from China.
U.S.
|
China
|
|
Tariff
|
Will not gain a lot of jobs as
other countries and robots would fill the gap.
|
Will pass tariffs to the
consumers.
Will have less profits.
Will lose the market to some
countries.
|
Barriers
|
Would open the market to more
US products.
|
Patriotism would discourage
citizens to buy US products.
|
Unfair rules
|
This is a bright spot for US.
|
Could have more impact 5 years
ago. China depends less on foreign
technologies than before.
|
Internal market
|
Will be reduced.
|
Will be expanded.
|
Treasury
|
Interest rate will be higher.
|
Reduce owning US Treasury.
|
Depreciation of the Yuan
|
Harmful for export goods to
China.
|
Make Chinese products more
competitive.
|
Core technologies
|
Will lose these sectors to
China eventually.
Intel, Micron… have suffered
already.
|
China will concentrate research
on CPU and memory.
China may limit rare earth
export to US.
|
US allies
|
Eventually they will be sided
with China due to economic reasons.
|
Eventually will gain more.
|
US Corporation
|
Many will suffer such as Apple.
|
Less FDI.
|
Soy
|
A direct blow.
|
Will switch to other countries
at higher prices.
Soy will be reduced in the mix
for feed.
|
Education & tourism
|
Will be decreased from China.
|
More universities and more
tourists to Europe.
|
U.S. wants China not to subsidize their industries. It is not valid as we do subsidize ourselves such as in agriculture. Many new companies are formed by former MIT students and professors in Boston area. Without the U.S. subsidies, there will be few of these companies.
The above
are my opinions on the outcomes. However, it is good for China in the long run
as the huge deficit will not be sustainable. I expect there are winners with
the settlement.
·
Farmers will gain; the loser are the replaced
countries such as Brazil.
·
Boeing will gain despite the recent problem of
the 737 Max planes.
·
Some selected drug companies will gain. I am
looking for the life-saving drugs that Chinese do not have.
·
Energy will gain such as LNG; the losers are
countries being replaced such as Australia’ LNG.
S.E. Asia countries will be
benefited as many Chinese factories will move there.---
The above is from my new book "Trade War with China". Click here.
No comments:
Post a Comment