I tried to use my historical
database to test out NASDAQ 100. The return is great. To illustrate, from
1/4/1999 to 6/6/2001, the annualized return is 54% vs SPY’s 1.6% without
considering dividends.
Do not ‘wow’ too early. The
reason of the high performance is due to the survivor bias. Many internet
companies were taken out from the index and/or the database, and hence the
performance as a group is deceivingly high.
The following chart is for the
popular high tech companies for the selected 10 years. For every one of the
following successful high tech companies, there must be many that do not make
it.
1990-2000
|
2000-2010
|
|
Annualized Return
|
Annualized Return
|
|
Microsoft
|
940%
|
-4%
|
EMC
|
7500%
|
-7%
|
Apple
|
20%
|
65%
|
Dell
|
8200%
|
-7%
|
Average
|
4000%
|
12%
|
The above figures are estimates
for demonstration without considering dividends and compounding. Dell has been
privatized today. Now, we
can draw some conclusions.
·
Tech stocks usually beat the S&P500 index.
Risk usually pays.
·
1990-2000 are the golden years for tech stocks.
·
2000-2010 are not so good for tech stocks due to
the crash of 2000. If it is not for Apple, the return of this portfolio would
be negative.
·
Except with Apple, it indicates the first ten
years (or the early phase) of the tech stocks give the best returns. After they
become mature companies, they seldom maintain the same growth rates. The worst
of the group in the first 10 years become the best after 2000.
Buy when the market does not favor this sector
Interestingly, you should buy
when the institution investors are dumping such as buying Apple in May, 2013 as
recommended in my book Scoring Stocks. Ensure they have value first by scoring
them fundamentally and allow at least one year for the market to recognize the
values.
I reviewed my old blog
and found some bargains I described in 12/03/2012. Here is the performance summary.
Again, all performance returns are annualized.
The stocks are AAPL, CSCO, INTC, MSFT, XRX, STX, WDC and
ALU.
One year later
|
Two years later
|
|
Ann. Return
|
84%
|
59%
|
SPY Ann. Return
|
28%
|
23%
|
Beat SPY by
|
200%
|
157%
|
Interestingly,
AAPL is the weakest performer in both tests. It must start with a high price.
Why the tech
companies perform worse after the first 10 years? Most likely it is due to
poor management:
·
When they are rich, they lose their entrepreneur
spirit.
·
They care about enjoying their options and do
not want to take risk in new and better products. Besides Xbox which was almost
cancelled by the management, how many successful new products Microsoft has
after Office?
·
Many of them were wrongly promoted from
marketing and sales. They are NOT the ones who create innovative products such
as Apple’s products.
·
Losing the visionary leaders such as Steve Jobs.
·
Other companies, foreign and local, are catching
up.
Tech companies need to make
better mouse traps continuously and with enthusiasm.
No comments:
Post a Comment