Monday, April 8, 2019

China's 5G


5G could be the most important China’s technical leadership while we do not even build 4G networks. 4G network is only built by Huawei, Ericsson and Nokia (via acquiring ALU) and they continue to be the same companies building 5G. I bought ALU at $1 per share and Cisco stock expecting Cisco would acquire ALU for the 4G technology. Cisco missed the opportunity and the US government should have helped Cisco to do so.

It would be one of the most important technologies from China. Besides the fast speed, it connects devices to devices. In 2019, we do not really know what the technology can do. Today’s driver-less car need the reduced latency provided by 5G. If the bumper-to-bumper space can be reduced, so can the capacity of roads. Initially some argue the danger of microwave used in 5G and 5G needs more antennas. Huawei provides these antennas in existing towers.

Huawei is at least one year ahead of the other two major companies providing 5G networks. Trump wants to cut down China’s leadership with the 5 Eyes alliance banning China's 5G in their countries. So far 5 Eyes become 3 Eyes. Most likely Australia will use 5G from China due to her trade dependency on China. United Kingdom argues that they can build a layer to reduce the security threat. Behind the decision, it is the richest man from Hong Kong controlling the network providers in Britain.

Using threat of security is not really valid. About 20% of the network I bet is passing China’s routers. Every smart phone can be used as a spy device as evidenced by our allies spied by U.S. So far, there is no evidence China uses smart phones to spy. It is not hard for the Chinese to use iPhone to spy.

The Huawei incident raises Chinese nationalism by not buying iPhones (about 20% of Apple’s sales from China) and it motivates Huawei working harder to move their technologies past us. Trump is the best sales person for Huawei as their sales have been substantially increased recently both in the network and its smart phones.


----

The above is from my book "Can China Say No?" available from  Amazon.com.
 

Huawei


Huawei incident


Huawei’s CFG Meng Wanzhou was arrested in Canada for violating US sanctions on Iran.

Meng is not a US citizen and has no obligation to abide by US laws. The arrest is more meaningful for criminals against US laws. It set up a clear roadblock to the trade negotiation. How can we protect our businessmen / women in foreign soils with this dumbest incident?

Embargoing together with several countries against one country is bullying to me.

If US continues this kind of bullying, we will be more isolated. I believe Trump forced Canada, Australia and India to work against China. They banned Huawei using their country as a test site for 5G network. It is a short-term solution but a long-term blunder. Huawei is working on producing their phones without US components and even the operating system.

Being one of the best if not the best phones in 2018, Huawei’s phones are not carried by the major networks as forced by the government. Virtually US bans Huawei selling phones in the US on national security reason. Should other countries ban iPhone for the same reason?

In 10 years or so, these puppets with exception of India and Japan will not listen to us any more. Canada and Australia depend exporting their farm products and ores to China. EU will make money in selling air planes to China. We already have lost S.E. Asia and Africa to China. Many EU countries are using Huawei's 4G networks and phones now. Huawei’s new phone (with 3 cameras and AI features) is debatably the best in 2018. Trump tried to slow down Huawei, but for how long?

If I were Meng, I would not leave China (maybe she does not trust China too). There is a rumor that her former company Skycom traded with Iran.
Apple and many US products in US will suffer. Chinese are motivated not to buy US products including iPhones. Many companies including Ericson and countries such as Vietnam will benefit from the Huawei incident. US will suffer in many fronts. China would spend my efforts in building the core technologies. China revenged by arresting two Canadians.
The following is abstract from Globe and Mail:

Ms. Meng is charged with violating U.S. sanctions on Iran. Yet, consider her arrest in the context of the large number of companies, U.S. and non-U.S., that have violated America’s sanctions against Iran and other countries. In 2011, for example, JP Morgan Chase paid $88.3 million in fines in 2011 for violating U.S. sanctions against Cuba, Iran and Sudan. Yet Jamie Dimon wasn’t grabbed off a plane and whisked into custody.

And JP Morgan Chase was hardly alone in violating U.S. sanctions. Since 2010, the following major financial institutions paid fines for such violations: Banco do Brasil, Bank of America, Bank of Guam, Bank of Moscow, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Barclays, BNP Paribas, Clearstream Banking, Commerzbank, Compass, Crédit Agricole, Deutsche Bank, HSBC, ING, Intesa Sanpaolo, National Bank of Abu Dhabi, National Bank of Pakistan, PayPal, RBS (ABN Amro), Société Générale, Toronto-Dominion Bank, Trans Pacific National Bank (now known as Beacon Business Bank), Standard Chartered and Wells Fargo.

None of the CEOs or CFOs of these sanction-busting banks were arrested and taken into custody for these violations. In all of these cases, the corporation – rather than an individual manager – was held accountable. Nor were they held accountable for the pervasive lawbreaking in the lead-up to or aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, for which the banks paid a staggering US$243 billion in fines, according to a recent tally...
Huawei is one of China’s most important technology companies and therefore a prime target in the Trump administration’s effort to slow or stop China’s advance into several high-technology sectors. America’s motivations in this economic war are partly commercial – to protect and favour laggard U.S. companies – and partly geopolitical. They certainly have nothing to do with upholding the international rule of law.

The U.S. appears to be trying to target Huawei especially because of the company’s success in marketing cutting-edge 5G technologies globally. The U.S. claims the company poses a specific security risk through hidden surveillance capabilities in its hardware and software. Yet the U.S. government has provided no evidence for this claim.


----

The above is from my book "Can China Say No?" available from  Amazon.com.

Why most economists' predictions are wrong


I read this article predicting the “End of the economic cycle”.

Why most market predictions by economists are wrong

It is interesting. The market cycle usually is 6 months ahead of the economic cycle. Based on this, the ‘end’ argument does not hold. However, as of today (4/09/2019), the market fundamentals are bad. I would move more to CDs after the settling of the trade war with China. To be warned, all markets are different.

I have about 10 hints for a potential market crash. The most deciding factor for me is the SMA, Simple Moving Average. When it turns negative, it is time to exit the market. The number of days in SMA depends on your risk tolerance. It is described in my book “Profit from coming market crash”. SMA does not pin point on the market peaks / bottoms as it depends on past data.

Most economists are wrong in predicting the market. The former Fed chairman said the economy was great and after a few months in 2008 the market crashed. There are many other factors such as politics and geopolitics. To illustrate, if there is a major war in Middle East, the market would tank no matter how good is the economy.

The good job report is good for the economy as it would reduce the chance of a recession. However, if it is too good, the Fed would raise interest rate to cool down the over-heated economy and hence it would reduce corporate profits. The job report on April, 2019 is fine for both the economy and the stock market. Mathematically incorrect, it is close to zero unemployment especially in the low end.

Grouping world’s economies

The world’s leading economies are US/EU (with Canada and Australia) and the challengers are Japan, S. Korea and China in the last two decades. The first group’s success is due to technology starting in Industrial Revolution in Britain.  U.S. joined the group after WW2 when Europe was destroyed.

The first group is declining slowly and is being replaced by the second group. It will take decades to be totally replaced judging from the decline of both Spain and Italy described next.

In 1850s, Spain and Italy were the richest countries with the ‘loots’ from South American and other colonies. When the country is rich, the citizens want to enjoy life by asking for higher salaries, more vacation days, better social welfare, better protection to the workers and environment. Hence, they lack the incentive to work harder and their products are less competitive. Are the U.S. and the EU countries are repeating history?

The other factor is population size. Populations in most of the mentioned countries are shrinking. Aging population makes the problem worse. You need more educated and productive citizens. They solve part of the problem by immigration. EU is learning the hard way in many incidents caused by terrorists from immigration. U.S. needs to immigrate top scientists to make us more competitive and the workers taking farm jobs and jobs even not wanted by the social welfare recipients.

Most of these countries are borrowing heavily – a common trick by politicians to buy votes. It solves the current problems and buys some votes, but it will be a big burden for next generations. Watch out when the national debt is about twice the GDP. Japan has the lost decades. We and many EU countries have not learned from Japan. China has the same problem now. In addition, China’s population has been surprisingly reduced even with the new two-child policy.

Most countries not included in the two groups will remain poor for decades to come. Many countries in Africa and S. America have high fertile rates – thanks to the Catholics. They consume all the limited resources. A growing population without education (required for productivity and innovation) is not good for them.

In general, countries with Protestants are economically better than Catholics and Catholics are economically better than countries spending too much time in religions such as Muslims and Indians. If you pray five times a day, when can you find time to work?

Most countries in the second group of the advanced economies are influenced by Confucius who teaches them to serve man and their family (actually the emperor to be precise). Confucius teaches them to be frugal (saving money for investing) and better educated for innovation.

Another factor is life style. Many countries not included in the two group enjoy their life style by not chasing material stuffs. They are happy by singing and dancing without fancy smart phones. Lack of consumption of these fancy products would not make them advances in economy. Good or bad? You decide. That’s one reason Mao’s era was backward as they’re not chasing satisfaction from these consumers' products.

China’s economy

Many arguments are valid for China at least from the beginning of Qing (the last dynasty) to today. In the beginning of Qing, China’s population had at least doubled after the war. China's GDP was leading the world. The higher the population growth, the higher the GDP mathematically.

Their ignorance on the Industrial Revolution in Britain led to China’s century of humiliation. Brits pushed drugs to China as they had nothing better to trade. That is the first time in recent history Chinese openly accepted western culture / technology. The biggest blow is the loss to Japan, which had been viewed as inferior for centuries. After Cultural Revolution, China produced the largest number of STEM students. After the embargo about 40 years ago, many Far East countries such as Japan, S. Korea, Hong Kong and Taiwan contributed initial management know-hows and technology. Followed by U.S.'s global companies providing foreign direct investments.

There is no incentive to work hard under communism and there is no freedom for individual thinking and hence no innovation. Most of our technology companies such as Microsoft, Apple and Facebook are founded by individual thinkers. Hopefully China will allow more freedom and protect intelligent properties in order to reach to the next phase in developing the country.

Deng changed the history of China with the help of U.S. to take out the embargo. Deng had lifted millions from starving to death, the worst suffering. He did not get a Novel Peace prize while Obama got one for doing nothing. It reflected how ignorance and bias the committee was. China today still has a lot of problems to fix but I bet it will be the largest economy in 2025 no matter how U.S. tries to stop it. China does not practice communism, which does not allow citizens to set up shops.

This short article covers many topics and it was written in an hour. I have not taken any course in economics, so it may be very different from what you learned from colleges.


----

The above is from my book "Can China Say No?" available from  Amazon.com.